Lobbyist: Behavioral health set to advance on Capitol Hill | Behavioral Healthcare Executive Skip to content Skip to navigation

Lobbyist: Behavioral health set to advance on Capitol Hill

March 26, 2013
by Shannon Brys, Associate Editor
| Reprints
Mike Bromberg at NAPHS meeting

New faces and new mental health bills make for serious opportunities to advance behavioral healthcare in Congress, says Mike Bromberg, chairman of The Capitol Health Group, who spoke to the professionals in attendance at the recent National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems (NAPHS) meeting.  The Capitol Health Group is a government affairs consultancy that focuses on healthcare legislation, policy and regulation. 

After welcoming behavioral health professionals to “the land of 12% approval,” Bromberg, who serves as a NAPHS lobbyist and consultant, shared his perspective on the numerous bills about mental health issues currently on Capitol Hill. Bromberg says what’s more interesting than the bills themselves, is finding out who the bills’ sponsors are. Since some of the congressmen who advocated strongly for mental health issues have retired, their places have been filled by others. These new faces, he reminded NAPHS attendees, are “an opportunity list for you.”  

Some of the bills – and faces – he touched on include:

  • Senator Mark Begich (D-AK) is sponsoring S. 153: Mental Health First Aid Act of 2013which would amend section 520J of the Public Health Service Act and authorize grants for mental health first aid training programs. The training programs implemented would be designed to train individuals in:

1.      Safe de-escalation of crisis situations.

2.      Recognition of the signs and symptoms of mental illness, including such common psychiatric conditions as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major clinical depression, and anxiety disorders.

3.      Timely referral to mental health services in the early stages of developing mental disorders in order to maximize the effectiveness of mental health services and avoid more costly subsequent behavioral health care.

  • Mental Health in Schools Act of 2013 sponsored by Sen. Al Franken (D-MN).  This bill would amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend projects relating to children and violence to provide access to school-based comprehensive mental health programs. The three main purposes of the act, according to the bill, are to:

1.      Revise, increase funding for, and expand the scope of the Safe Schools-Healthy Students program in order to provide access to more comprehensive school-based mental health services and supports;

2.      Provide for comprehensive staff development for school and community service personnel working in the school; and

    3.     Provide for comprehensive training for children with mental health disorders, for parents, siblings, and other family members of such children, and for concerned members of the community.

This bill serves to reauthorize and improve the Mentally Ill Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act of 2004. It will add the following terms to the Section 2991 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968: Peer-to-peer programs, qualified veterans, and veterans treatment court program.

The bill will also enables the Attorney General to award grants to establish or expand veterans treatment court programs; peer-to-peer programs for qualified veterans; practices that identify and provide treatment, rehabilitation, legal, transitional, and other appropriate services to qualified veterans who have been incarcerated; and training programs to teach criminal justice, law enforcement, corrections, mental health, and substance abuse personnel how to identify and appropriately respond to incidents involving qualified veterans.

  • Excellence in Mental Health Act , sponsored by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI). Bromberg said that Stabenow “is on the Finance Committee and in a perfect position to help.” This bill would expand access to community mental health centers and improves the quality of mental health care.  It would also amend Section 1913 of the Public Health Service Act in numerous ways, including replacing ‘community mental health centers’ with ‘federally qualified community behavioral health centers’ and adding criteria for the creation of Federally Qualified Community Behavioral Health Centers.

Bromberg also spoke of S. 480: NICS Reporting Improvement Act of 2013, which is sponsored by a bipartisan group of four senators – Republicans Jeff Flake (AZ) and Lindsey Graham (SC) and Democrats Mark Begich (AK) and Mark Pryor (AR).

The bill, which is about gun violence, addresses questions such as:

o   If there’s a registry of some sort, does that breach HIPAA?

o   Who’s going to run the registry?

o   Would the use of a registry be an invasion of privacy?