Skip to content Skip to navigation

Seeking to peer through an opaque window

April 3, 2015
by Ron Manderscheid
| Reprints

If you attempt to see through an opaque window, you will be confronted with a muted, reflected image of yourself, which is likely to be distorted. This is the dilemma facing the health and behavioral health care fields as they attempt to peer far beyond disease and health to questions of living and general well-being. In so doing, they are confronted only with themselves and the inherent limitations of our health and behavioral health care interventions. One could dub such efforts an attempt to medicalize everything.

This effort “from the inside outward” is bound to fail for several reasons. First, 80 to 90 percent of a person’s health status has nothing to do with either health or behavioral health care. Rather, it is due to one’s genetics, social and physical determinants, and lifestyle. Second, many factors in living and general well-being derive from the effects of the social and physical determinants upon our culture, communities, and families, and cannot be ameliorated or addressed by health care. As a pointed example, a child born into poverty will hear 30 million fewer words by age five than a child born into a middle class family. Clearly, the solution to this issue resides outside the scope of our health and behavioral health care systems.

What is driving our fields to peer into this opaque window? The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has unleashed an unprecedented level of creativity, innovation, and forward thinking. At the same time, it also has fostered unprecedented system changes, such as large-scale service integration and financial reforms, which are very anxiety provoking and threatening to health and behavioral health care providers. In the face of these threats, fear is driving efforts to extend the scope of activities covered by these providers.

To help understand these developments, it is important to note that our health care system already has moved from Healthcare 1.0—biomedical interventions—to Healthcare 2.0--biopsychosocial interventions--and now is on the cusp of moving to Healthcare 3.0--a framework that focuses upon healthy development over the life course.  It is in Healthcare 3.0 that we begin to encounter the inherent limits of health and behavioral health care, and confront the dilemma that health is related to all aspects of life.

To address this dilemma effectively, our health and behavioral health care fields will require a new paradigm. This paradigm shift can be developed through collaborative discussion and then communicated broadly throughout governmental, provider, and peer communities. The new paradigm will need to differentiate and link cultural/social interventions and health/behavioral health interventions.

A few key principles for developing this new paradigm would include:

Pages

Topics

Ron Manderscheid

Exec. Dir., NACBHDD and NARMH

Ron Manderscheid

@DrRonM

www.nacbhdd.org

Ron Manderscheid, Ph.D., serves as the Executive Director of the National Association of County...