Skip to content Skip to navigation

Suicide "Prevention" - be careful using absolute terms

September 12, 2012
by James M. Hunt, AIA
| Reprints

Designers, product manufacturers and health care facilities should be very careful with using absolute terms such as suicide “prevention”, tamper “proof”, “anti”- ligature and similar terms from which a reader or listener may infer that a warrantee or guarantee is being given that there is absolutely no way that a patient could use this design, product or facility to harm themselves or others.  These terms suggest an absolute condition.  It is like the old saying about being “a little bit pregnant”.  This is impossible.  Either you are, or you are not. 

If a designer, manufacturer or hospital states that they are going to design something that will “prevent” suicide or “stop” patients from harming themselves or that their facility is suicide “proof”, they are in danger of having a very long day in court sometime in the future.  Attorneys have the benefit of hindsight.  If a patient did actually harm themselves or others using your design or product or while in your facility, then it must not have been good enough and you must have been negligent.  Otherwise this incident would not have happened. 

No, it really isn’t that simple, but the attorney for the plaintiff will try to make it seem that way and you may have a tough time convincing a jury that you really did try. 

What can you do to protect yourself and your company?

I always try to replace “prevent” with “resist”, “anti-ligature” with “ligature resistant”, “tamper-proof” with “tamper-resistant”, etc.  Most, if not all, products and design solutions that are available for use in these facilities are not perfect.  Patients are very good at finding ways to circumvent the designers’ best attempts to keep their buildings and/or products from being used to harm themselves or others.  I am convinced that psychiatric patients are typically well above average intelligence and are very creative in finding ways to harm or kill themselves. 

Just because a product or design is not perfect does not mean that it shouldn’t be used.  If it reduces some of the risk of the more commonly used options, then it should definitely be considered.  As I discussed in a previous blog on this website, every organization needs to determine its tolerance for risk for a large number of design decisions as well as product selections.  The designers need to clearly present the positive as well as negative aspects of each decision so that the organization can make an informed decision that takes into account its risk tolerance with respect to its patient population, staffing pattern, corporate culture and many other elements.  Careful review of these elements by the hospital’s Risk Management and Safety Programs with proper documentation of the reasons why certain conditions were provided may be very helpful if an incident occurs.   

Pages

Topics

Jim Hunt

Behavioral Healthcare Design Consultant

Jim Hunt

www.bhfcllc.com

James M. Hunt, AIA, is a practicing architect and facility management professional with over 40...